PROPOSED PILOT · NOT YET OPERATING

Safe AI Learning Station

Fredericton Holograms helps people learn, create, question, and participate in AI—safely, accessibly, and together.

FrederictonHolograms.com can become a Community AI Safety Bridge: a small, accessible holographic learning station where people create with AI, question it, protect their privacy and culture, and earn through local creative work.

It responds to real museum-sector problems (limited staff capacity, funding pressure, digital gaps and low collection visibility) without claiming that holograms solve them. It is a staff-supported learning and interpretation tool, not an AI that replaces museum staff.

Concept art: a beaver guide in a glowing heart hoodie welcomes visitors, beside panels labelled Live Captions and Calm Mode.
Concept art. [SYNTHETIC]

Why museums need this

Published survey figures, shown as reported. They describe the sector; they are not results of this project.

AI & capacity

  • Museums using AI57%

    REPORTED UNESCO–ICOM 2026

  • No internal AI policy, strategy or guidelines55%

    REPORTED UNESCO–ICOM 2026

  • Museums providing AI staff training17%

    REPORTED UNESCO–ICOM 2026

Funding & staff

  • Lack of funding is the top strategic constraint76%

    REPORTED Ithaka S+R 2025

  • Operating expenses allocated to personnel (average)47%

    REPORTED Ithaka S+R 2025

  • Collection currently on view (average share)13%

    REPORTED Ithaka S+R 2025

Climate & resilience

  • Have an emergency or climate-response plan86%

    REPORTED Ithaka S+R 2025

  • Power outages or blackouts, past 5 years41%

    REPORTED Ithaka S+R 2025

  • Humidity or extreme-temperature issues, past 5 years40%

    REPORTED Ithaka S+R 2025

  • Conducted a comprehensive climate impact assessment48%

    REPORTED Ithaka S+R 2025

  • Estimated the cost of reducing their climate footprint26%

    REPORTED Ithaka S+R 2025

Core solution

A compact, disability-led holographic exhibit and workshop system for museums, libraries, schools, tourism sites, and community centres. It combines:

Character system

Fictional guides, not impersonations of real people, unless explicit permission, consent and cultural authority are in place.

Sparky the Beaver

Friendly AI-literacy guide

Explains how AI works, asks questions, invites reflection

Safety boundary: Never claims to be human, conscious, or an authority

The Memory Keeper

Local-history guide

Helps visitors explore Fredericton and New Brunswick stories

Safety boundary: Clearly fictional; historical claims link to sources

The Accessibility Companion

Inclusion guide

Offers plain-language, captioned, and alternative-format support

Safety boundary: Does not diagnose, advise medically, or replace human support

The Creator Companion

Creative collaborator

Helps visitors make stories, images, or exhibit ideas

Safety boundary: Labels AI output; protects visitor ownership and privacy

The Question Asker

Critical-thinking guide

Helps visitors identify bias, errors, and missing context

Safety boundary: Encourages verification; does not present AI output as fact

Key rule: every character says, in plain language, that it is an AI character, not a real person, and that visitors should verify important information.

Safe AI learning activities

  1. 01

    Ask the Character

    Visitors ask a safe, pre-approved question about a local exhibit, artifact, or historical theme. The character gives a short answer, shows a source or uncertainty label, and invites the visitor to check the museum label or ask staff.

    “Sparky, what might this object have been used for?”

    Learning goal: AI can help explore, but humans and sources remain important.

  2. 02

    Spot the Mistake

    The character gives a short local-history explanation containing one deliberate, clearly marked error. Visitors find it using exhibit labels, QR codes, or staff support.

    Learning goal: AI can be wrong; verification is a skill.

  3. 03

    Create With AI

    Visitors create a short story, poem, exhibit title, or visual concept inspired by an artifact. The result is labelled AI-assisted, consent is asked before saving or displaying it, and visitors can delete their input.

    Learning goal: AI is a creative tool, not an autonomous authority.

  4. 04

    Privacy Mirror

    Visitors learn what they should and should not share with an AI system: personal information, location, passwords, images of other people, and sensitive family or health details.

    “What should I never tell an AI character?”

    Learning goal: Privacy is part of AI literacy.

  5. 05

    Accessibility Challenge

    Visitors test whether an exhibit explanation works for different needs: large text, captions, audio description, plain language, and screen-reader-friendly QR content.

    Learning goal: Accessible design benefits everyone.

Museum problems addressed

Museum problemFrederictonHolograms solutionMeasurable outcome
Funding pressureModular rental, workshop, tourism, and sponsorship modelRevenue per activation; sponsor leads
Staff capacityCharacter handles repeat questions; staff remain in controlStaff time saved; visitor questions answered
Low collection visibilityBrings less-displayed artifacts and stories into interactive experiencesObjects featured; visitor engagement
Digital-capability gapProvides ready-made, accessible AI learning activitiesStaff trained; sessions delivered
AI governance gapBuilt-in consent, privacy, source labels, and escalation rulesPolicy adopted; incidents logged
Visitor engagementInteractive, localized, participatory experiencesDwell time; repeat visits; feedback
AccessibilityPlain language, captions, audio, tactile supports, quiet optionsAccessibility satisfaction; accommodation requests met
Community relevanceLocal co-design and cultural-content reviewCommunity partners involved; content approvals

Safe AI rules

Every station displays and enforces these rules.

  1. 1AI characters are fictional. They are not real people and do not have feelings, consciousness, or authority.
  2. 2Visitors stay in control. They can stop, skip, repeat, or exit at any time.
  3. 3No personal data required. Visitors can participate without creating an account.
  4. 4Consent before saving. No visitor creation, image, voice, or story is stored or displayed without clear permission.
  5. 5No impersonation. Real historical figures require documented permission, cultural authority, and clear labelling.
  6. 6Sources over certainty. Important historical or scientific claims link to museum labels, archives, or staff-reviewed sources.
  7. 7Human escalation. A staff member or trained volunteer is available for questions, concerns, or accessibility support.
  8. 8Accessibility by default. Captions, plain language, large text, audio options, quiet-mode settings, and physical access are built in.
  9. 9No medical, legal, or financial advice. Characters redirect sensitive questions to appropriate human services.
  10. 10Transparent AI label. Every AI-generated response, image, or story is visibly labelled.

Fredericton 90-day pilot

Pilot name: Fredericton Safe AI Learning Station. No host has been confirmed yet.

Host options

  • A local museum or heritage site
  • Fredericton public library
  • A community centre
  • A tourism visitor centre
  • Planet Hatch or another innovation space
  • A school or adult-learning program

Pilot components

  • One holographic or projected character station
  • Three safe AI learning activities
  • Two local story modules
  • Staff facilitation guide
  • Visitor consent and privacy notice
  • Accessibility checklist
  • Feedback and evaluation form
  • Monthly review report

Pilot roles

RoleResponsibility
FrederictonHologramsProvide system, characters, training, maintenance, and reporting
Host venueProvide space, staff time, visitor access, and local context
Community co-designersReview stories, language, accessibility, and cultural accuracy
Accessibility advisorsTest interaction paths and recommend improvements
Museum staffApprove content, supervise sessions, and handle escalations
ParticipantsUse the system, give feedback, and decide whether to save creations

Revenue model HYPOTHESIS

Pricing hypotheses to test during the pilot. No revenue or attendance is promised.

OfferCustomerPrice approachRevenue purpose
Pilot installationMuseum, library, tourism siteOne-time setup feeHardware, content, integration
Monthly station licenceVenueMonthly subscriptionSoftware, updates, support
School workshopSchools and community groupsPer-session feeFacilitation and materials
Tourism activationHotels, festivals, visitor centresPer-event or seasonal feeVisitor engagement
SponsorshipLocal businesses and fundersSponsorship packageAccessibility and community access
Custom character moduleMuseum, municipality, cultural organizationProject feeLocal story and exhibit integration
Staff trainingMuseums and librariesWorkshop feeAI literacy and safe-use training

Evaluation metrics

Only what the pilot can realistically measure. Targets are examples, not results.

MetricExample targetWhy it matters
Sessions completed30 in 90 daysTests basic demand
Unique participants150 in 90 daysTests reach
Accessibility satisfactionAt least 80% positiveTests inclusive design
Staff-rated usefulnessAt least 70% positiveTests operational fit
Content accuracy issuesZero unresolved critical issuesTests safety and quality
Consent compliance100%Tests privacy practice
Visitor-created works savedOptional and consent-basedTests creative engagement
Repeat visitorsTrack only if privacy-compliantTests return engagement
Cost per sessionCalculate after pilotTests financial viability
Sponsor or partner leads3 qualified conversationsTests partnership potential

Sector scenario 2026–2036 SYNTHETIC

An illustrative comparison of a sector-wide safe-AI capacity effort against no plan. Only the 2026 values are reported data; every later value is an assumption, not a forecast.

A single Fredericton pilot cannot move these sector-wide figures on its own. The “with plan” line shows a target direction that many organisations would have to share. It should be read as a goal to test, not an expected result.

AI staff training, % of museums, 2026–2036. The 2026 starting value is reported; every later point is an illustrative assumption.

AI staff training: scenario values by year
YearWithout planWith plan (target)Gap
202617.0%17.0%0.0 pp
202719.0%24.0%+5.0 pp
202821.0%31.0%+10.0 pp
202923.0%38.0%+15.0 pp
203025.0%45.0%+20.0 pp
203127.0%52.0%+25.0 pp
203229.0%59.0%+30.0 pp
203331.0%66.0%+35.0 pp
203433.0%73.0%+40.0 pp
203535.0%80.0%+45.0 pp
203637.0%87.0%+50.0 pp

Copy-paste text for partners

Partner pitch

FrederictonHolograms Safe AI Learning Station

FrederictonHolograms proposes a small, accessible holographic AI learning station for museums, libraries, schools, and community spaces.

The station uses friendly fictional AI characters to help visitors explore local history, create with AI, learn about privacy, and practise checking AI-generated information. It is designed to support staff, not replace them.

The system includes safe-learning activities, accessibility features, consent controls, source labels, and a simple evaluation process. Characters are clearly fictional and do not impersonate real people without permission and appropriate cultural authority.

We are seeking one local pilot partner to test the concept over 90 days. The pilot would measure visitor engagement, accessibility, staff usefulness, content accuracy, privacy compliance, and operational feasibility.

This is not a claim that holograms or AI will solve museum funding or staffing challenges. It is a practical, community-centred pilot to test whether accessible AI learning can support museums, tourism, education, and creative participation in Fredericton.

Website section (Markdown)

## Safe AI Learning Characters

FrederictonHolograms is developing accessible holographic AI learning experiences for museums, libraries, schools, and community spaces.

Our approach uses clearly fictional characters to help people:

- Explore local history and culture
- Learn how AI works and where it can fail
- Create stories, images, and ideas with AI
- Protect privacy and personal information
- Practise checking information before trusting it
- Participate in accessible creative learning

### Our safety approach

AI characters are clearly labelled as fictional. They do not claim to be human, conscious, or an authority. Visitors can stop, skip, repeat, or exit at any time.

We do not require personal accounts. We do not save visitor creations, images, voice recordings, or stories without clear consent.

Important historical and scientific information is linked to sources, museum labels, archives, or staff-reviewed materials. Human staff remain available for questions, concerns, and accessibility support.

### Accessibility

The experience is designed for diverse cognitive and physical needs. It includes plain language, captions, large-text options, audio alternatives, quiet-mode settings, and clear ways to ask for help.

### Pilot invitation

We are seeking one Fredericton museum, library, school, tourism site, or community organization to host a 90-day Safe AI Learning Station pilot.

The pilot will test visitor engagement, accessibility, staff usefulness, content accuracy, privacy compliance, and operational feasibility.

Fredericton first. Expand only if it works.

This is not a national-scale solution or a proven educational intervention. It is a Fredericton-first pilot that can be tested, improved, and expanded only if it shows real value for museums, visitors, staff, and community partners.

Propose a host venue